Since my ideal investment product is a global macro quantitative equity fund, this blog is about global macro analysis and calls, as well as how to implement these insights in quantitative equity investments.
Friday, February 14, 2014
Saturday, February 8, 2014
The real risk going forward for a big correction in the U.S. markets
In my post two days ago, I mentioned that
the U.S. markets will not have a big correction while emerging markets will continue
to have serious problems due to China. I do want to point out a realistic risk
of a big correction in the U.S., due to the actions of developed market central
banks, especially the Fed.
The
Fed and ECB are de facto tightening stimulus. The Fed has a strong tendency to taper,
even if it is premature, and thinks the US market is already a mini-bubble. So
they have changed the stance since September 2012 when they show the spirit of
whatever it takes to reflate and stimulate the economy and are committing the
same stupid mistake since early 2011 (which I pointed out in an earlier post
from my thoughts about my visit to the Fed in early 2011). Remember I turned
all out bullish and have stayed that way until now. Also, even though they are
right that tapering is not really tightening or raising interest rates and they
have been signaling so since early last year, investors continue to believe
otherwise. If we take a global view, investors are right, because the condition
is being tightened in emerging markets due to the Fed’s actions. Japanese Central Bank is now being quite
silly to believe that they should wait till things falter before they act to
reflate instead of preempting the dangers and reach their feasible 2% target
ASAP (the target is reachable if they are determined enough). It is courageous
to commit seppuku after failure, but why not use the same courage to achieve
positive results and avoid being a tragic hero?
At the same time, China almost has no choice but to reduce the suicidal steroid that
it has been taking if it wants not to have a few lost decades that will be the most
painful in history. This is what’s different between now and all the prior episodes
of risk on and risk off, and China lies at the heart of the downtrend of
emerging markets. So stay away from EM in the next couple of years and waiting
for all the casualties to fall.
These forces may converge later this year
and crash the global markets, and taking U.S. markets as a casualty. For the
U.S. markets, the biggest danger is not from EM but from Western central
bankers who start to commit the same mistake of premature tightening even
though inflation is nowhere to be found. These central bankers, especially the
Fed, can trigger another round of disinflation or even deflation (in Europe)
scare or actual reality of disinflation and deflation. That will be a trigger for a large correction
in the U.S. markets. For one thing, without inflation, corporate sales and
profits could falter. So this will set
up a shorting opportunity, especially for the riskiest assets. It will also likely
set up another risk on rally after they do the 180 degree Fed turn again to
stop the premature tightening. So there will be more money to be made at these
junctures.
Thursday, February 6, 2014
Risk on or risk off, depending on which one you meant; still my themes play out
Lately the pundits and investors are
running around like headless chicken again, with their confidence shattered by
the broad selloff globally, especially in emerging markets. The usual question
is asked again: Is it risk on or risk off?
Asking this question means you are
clueless. It really depends which market you talk about. If it is the US, it
will still do well and once reaching about 10% correction, lots of people will
jump in so as not to miss the opportunity, even though earnings growth will be
under some pressure. So the current correction may be mostly over, and likely
people will jump in even before 10% correct because they are afraid of other
people taking the bargain from them. So if you are holding US risky assets, the
risk is still on.
For EM, they will keep going down for a
couple of more years, with temporary reversals like the second half of 2013.
The trend there will be driven mostly by China’s numbers (if it turns brighter
for a couple of quarters, things will stabilize for a while, but the trend is
down for the last couple of quarters after some bright numbers earlier last
year), but also some noticeable events such as Argentina (more people wake up
that some EM are much worse than thought). So far, China’s numbers are still
not so bright; there have also been a few bad surprises. More importantly,
China, and EM’s trend, is still going down. So the risk is always off. However,
in the near turn, this round of pessimism may have been largely vented and this
may be a time to start to get into the market to play some risky asset rally.
So the whole thing/theme is still exactly
playing out as what I predicted 2.5 years ago. Not too many surprises.
My view on Europe has changed again. I
have been suggesting buying European bonds and stocks since summer 2012, which
turned out to be a hugely profitable trade. However, after the huge rally,
European liquid assets have been largely fairly priced. So it is not a bargain
any more, unless ECB takes big action again, which they have so far been
girlish about.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)